From owner-cvs-all Tue Dec 18 1:54:28 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from maile.telia.com (maile.telia.com [194.22.190.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C60837B41F for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 01:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from d1o913.telia.com (d1o913.telia.com [195.252.44.241]) by maile.telia.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBI9sHs19020 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:54:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from ertr1013.student.uu.se (h185n2fls20o913.telia.com [212.181.163.185]) by d1o913.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA19081 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:54:11 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 1248 invoked by uid 1001); 18 Dec 2001 09:54:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:54:08 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Oliver Kiddle Cc: Jos Backus , Steve Price , Andreas Klemm , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/apsfilter Makefile ports/print/apsfilter/files patch-bin::aps2file ports/print/apsfilter/scripts pre-configure Message-ID: <20011218095408.GA1231@student.uu.se> Mail-Followup-To: Oliver Kiddle , Jos Backus , Steve Price , Andreas Klemm , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200112171847.fBHIlbP69769@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011217130555.J72144@bsd.havk.org> <20011217201850.A21347@student.uu.se> <20011217193709.GA85890@lizzy.bugworks.com> <3C1F0F26.4907FEE@yahoo.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C1F0F26.4907FEE@yahoo.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 09:40:54AM +0000, Oliver Kiddle wrote: > Jos Backus wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:18:50PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > (As I understand it the bash-developers try fairly hard to make sure bash > > > follows the POSIX standard. The zsh developers don't care all that much > > > about it.) > > I am one of the zsh developers and I can tell you that that simply isn't the > case. If you find any case where zsh breaks the POSIX standard then please > let us know and I'll try to get it fixed. It is cared about. Good. Nice to hear. > > Stories of zsh being less than POSIX compliant seem to stem from the fact > that when it isn't pretending to be sh, it fixes some of the design mistakes > of the original Bourne shell (such as word splitting variable expansions). I suspect that my understanding was based on the documentation available when I started using zsh. Since this was a couple of versions ago (zsh v2.x) I guess things have changed. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message