From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 29 00:42:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50083106566B; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [70.36.220.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6148FC0A; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sa-nc-common3-173.static.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5T0gXcs038953 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:42:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <20120628230725.GB1438@garage.freebsd.pl> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:42:28 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <03CF2422-2A8F-4055-B5CF-F6F110D146F4@xcllnt.net> References: <201206270807.23347.jhb@freebsd.org> <4FEB0079.7050008@yandex.ru> <201206271028.54477.jhb@freebsd.org> <4FEB5A3C.5050900@borderworlds.dk> <1900D4C1-E5E5-446F-ABBF-976A2DFEB36B@xcllnt.net> <4FEC22A0.9000109@freebsd.org> <4FEC2D86.2040505@freebsd.org> <8D85513D-CDFC-4D62-AA5A-F82F46E28CE5@xcllnt.net> <20120628214902.00004e34@unknown> <146B8DC1-4B66-4E78-BBB3-3954DC305424@xcllnt.net> <20120628230725.GB1438@garage.freebsd.pl> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:23:50 +0000 Cc: Doug Rabson , Marcel Moolenaar , Christian Laursen , freebsd-hackers , Andriy Gapon , Stefan Esser , "Andrey V. Elsukov" , Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-current Subject: Re: [CFC/CFT] large changes in the loader(8) code X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:42:44 -0000 On Jun 28, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >> >> I would be having less problems if the mirroring didn't force the backup >> GPT header in anything but the last sector. [...] > > GPT backup header is placed in the last sector of the mirror device, > just like the user asked. Gmirror doesn't force anything. User decides > to put GPT partitioning on the mirror device instead of raw disk. > Gmirror doesn't even know and doesn't have to know how the user uses > data area on the mirror device. This really is a cop-out paragraph. >> [...] If the metadata was somewhere >> else, then we wouldn't need to kluge various places to deal with the >> ambiguity and visible interoperability problems of the various tools and >> OSes. [...] > > Where is "somewhere else", exactly? I already suggested a few things in this thread. Go read it. I'm bored now, so I'll just wait for UEFI booting to be forced upon those who mirror the whole disk with gmirror. I think that's when we will have a more substantial and meaningful continuation of this thread. -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net