From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Aug 27 15: 0:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972471560C for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:00:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id PAA54022; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:00:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908272200.PAA54022@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ade Lovett Subject: Re: ports/13423: unbreak devel/gnustep Reply-To: Ade Lovett Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/13423; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ade Lovett To: Chris Piazza Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/13423: unbreak devel/gnustep Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 16:56:18 -0500 On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 02:49:09PM -0700, Chris Piazza wrote: > > Yes, it is. I've had patches like this sitting on my computer > for over a month now. I'll commit this change, but the port > must still stay broken: it sets ${PREFIX}. I tried to fix > that half-heartedly but didn't really give it that much of > an effort as I have no idea what this port even does :). No problem. The road to true enlightenment (in this case a fully functional port) is made up of many small changes. I'm just trying to clear up some of the more obvious errors, especially for those owned by ports@freebsd.org, before 3.3-RELEASE -aDe [off to rebuild a box after yet another seagate drive failure] -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message