From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 20:35:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8387330E for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4088D1AE0 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) for freebsd-current@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1WdQN0-0005gN-Jm>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:35:46 +0200 Received: from g225185143.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.225.185.143] helo=thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) for freebsd-current@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1WdQN0-002S50-Hq>; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:35:46 +0200 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:35:40 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL (OpenBSD) Message-ID: <20140424223540.627bf130.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/wJWwbVZOM..b5nfjNKbBQgk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.225.185.143 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:35:54 -0000 --Sig_/wJWwbVZOM..b5nfjNKbBQgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, called L= ibreSSL. As OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the code of = OpenSSL, I'd like to hear what the plans are in FreeBSD for this critical portion of sof= tware. Is FreeBSD going to support the effords taken by OpenBSD and participating = in the LibreSSL development (http://www.libressl.org/)? oh --Sig_/wJWwbVZOM..b5nfjNKbBQgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTWXWiAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8s9MIAJFs0UvJ5HmqadmVwEDQrSWA vsM60aT+2M6VnyKKJ1OVUKENiXatExLNnVprB9FQoRkwH7Hkd8zU/Oe4hpNZ46Jz OnP8pMk4RbkKSJFB8t2IsLN4HKnObIunZShRhBdHH/1d8ZefASoYxjJ57Nu/TGwS 3A+p23csVDFErUAMWe8HmOhRI7b1g2eYL0b4Cu/vbpcFcWPmwGA4XAg9K5k2XGaG TBzBaJS9QQzAJIDWKy3iZbf9wIXTCPBT31OJWoyadw1kHpmWQigCYD5H7b/6Jrxy 8kjmFngAOETt6dc0FmlIvZ8gkc7/a+BbGO5yehbk5dpjb+XJRfZQG7pK+4Lwbas= =5kYP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wJWwbVZOM..b5nfjNKbBQgk--