From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 22 0:18:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from skaarup.org (skaarup.org [130.228.230.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E4A37BC70 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 00:18:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rasmus@gal.dk) Received: from localhost (skaarup@localhost) by skaarup.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04548; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:18:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rasmus@gal.dk) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 09:18:47 +0100 (CET) From: Rasmus Skaarup X-Sender: skaarup@skaarup.org To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp fails to boot on K6/2 In-Reply-To: <19621.953702955@zippy.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan K. Hubbard said: > Good idea, terrible name. Can't you guys some up with something better? :) kern.flp -> start.flp mfsroot.flp -> install.flp boot.flp -> bigstart.flp bigdisk.flp ? I thought we could rename kern.flp and mfsroot.flp aswell, since they their names don't make much sense to anyone other than the one compiling the darn disks :-) Best regards Rasmus Skaarup > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 04:32:35PM -0800, Doug White wrote: > > > I would be in favor of renaming the boot.flp to something obviously > > > different, like 288boot.flp, to untrain us 2.x heads that got used to the > > > > Great idea. Would you be able to make the changes locally and test a > > `make release'? Then all we need to do is pass the patch pass JKH. > > (harder to say "NO" to working code) > > > > -- > > -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message