From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Sep 17 18:37:53 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id SAA15238
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 18:37:53 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA15229
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 18:37:47 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA13212; Sun, 17 Sep 1995 18:37:09 -0700
To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
cc: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth), current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Which SUP files are available and where ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 Sep 1995 15:47:26 EDT."
             <9509171947.AA10198@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 18:37:09 -0700
Message-ID: <13209.811388229@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> For those who have a high-speed net connection, CTM is a lose.  It's
> too easy to get your source tree into a state where CTM decides that
> it can't do anything, and then you have to do manual repair, whereas

Yes, CTM is a nice tool, but it's also not very useful to those of us
who need to stay up-to-date on an on-demand basis.  I ran with CTM for
awhile and generally liked it but then had to back out and go to sup
again while we were rolling 2.0.5 - I just wasn't getting the changes
when *I* wanted them!

sup and CTM were designed to do very *different* things and I don't
think that one can replace the other.

						Jordan