Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 16:16:15 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: alex@fa.tdktca.com (Alex Nash) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, phk@freebsd.org, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone else noticed.. Message-ID: <199606132316.QAA00289@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <31C02534.7E0645F5@fa.tdktca.com> from "Alex Nash" at Jun 13, 96 09:27:00 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Yeah, that's about average for a high-end P5. With my P5/133 I > get "435.64 real 380.14 user 24.26 sys", which > is about what you'd expect. > > You need a P6 to drop below the 3 minute barrier though. :-) Or a dual processor P5 running make -j :) My dual P90, building GENERIC: 437.02 real ~72% per processor with no real kernel reentrancy (real reentrancy would probal jack it up to 92-94%, if fine-grained). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606132316.QAA00289>