From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 31 10:26:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA00124 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 31 May 1997 10:26:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA00119 for ; Sat, 31 May 1997 10:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id TAA25574; Sat, 31 May 1997 19:26:42 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA28443; Sat, 31 May 1997 19:24:36 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19970531192436.YF59200@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 19:24:36 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: tom@tomqnx.com (Tom Torrance at home) Subject: Re: RELENG_2_2 Problems References: X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60_p2-3,5,8-9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: ; from Tom Torrance at home on May 31, 1997 02:02:11 -0400 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Tom Torrance at home wrote: > 1) The RELNOTES.TXT files for 2.2.x-RELEASE all specify that this release > has full CD-R support for the HP6020i. It seems to me that this release > has NO (zero) support for the HP6020. Did I just miss it, or did > someone forget to commit the necessary changes to the RELENG_2_2 tree? ``Someone'' didn't know about the HP6020 (without the `i') at all before you came up here. It's a simple matter to replace the `i' with an asterisk in the scsiconf.c entry, but you first gotta know that there are these drives around at all. > 2) SCSI changes submitted during the past couple of weeks seem to have > broken the support for my SCSI II tape drive. For every access, I now get > > /kernel: st0(ahc0:6:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:20,0 Invalid command operation code Turn on SCSIDEBUG, and see what exactly the invalid opcode is. You didn't even mention what tape drive you're using, and i hope you don't assume that you're the only -current user with a tape drive at all. ;-) Since other people don't complain, it's certainly something very specific to _your_ drive. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)