From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 9 17:38:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D2B16A5B4 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 17:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74FF43D55 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 17:38:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-current-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 7591 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2006 17:38:34 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Nov 2006 17:38:34 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6E71D28430; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:38:33 -0500 (EST) To: "Kevin Oberman" To: free bsd References: <20061109155745.2F9764506A@ptavv.es.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:38:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061109155745.2F9764506A@ptavv.es.net> (Kevin Oberman's message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2006 07:57:45 -0800") Message-ID: <443b8swmee.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: gahn , Riemer Palstra Subject: Re: keep ports updated X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: free bsd List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:38:35 -0000 "Kevin Oberman" writes: > I don't know about portsnap, if you use csup (V6.1 or newer) or cvsup, > you should delete your ports tree first! (rm -rf /usr/ports/*). Not necessarily; there are other ways to handle the situation. > These programs keep a record of what files have been updated and their > versions and they will not know about any files already in your ports > tree but no longer in CVS. This can leave you system with orphans that > might include patch files which might cause builds to fail, or worse, > cause apps to mis-behave. You can use a lot less bandwidth by getting the bookkeeping correct first, and then updating. In that case, it will all work properly. http://www.cvsup.org/faq.html#adopt