From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Feb 28 14:18:59 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA20267
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 14:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nervosa.com (root@nervosa.com [192.187.228.86])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA20260
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 14:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nervosa.com (coredump@onyx.nervosa.com [10.0.0.1]) by nervosa.com (8.7.4/nervosa.com.2) with SMTP id OAA21257; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 14:18:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 14:18:41 -0800 (PST)
From: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com>
To: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com>
cc: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: RE: Win32 (was:Re: Go SCSI! Big improvement...)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.AUX.3.91.960227094526.19218B-100000@covina.lightside.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960228141720.20944I-100000@nervosa.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 27 Feb 1996, Jake Hamby wrote:
> I agree, 110%!  Come to think of it, the ONLY programs I've seen with a 
> decent GUI (that are available on more than one vendor's flavor of Unix) 
> are Netscape, and MAYBE Emacs.  That is if you don't count WINE, WABI, 
> TWIN, and Softwindows (evil grin!) ;-)
> ---Jake

See, I see a slight problem here, I don't know if it's me, but I see the 
proper way as their being a base GUI (i.e. twm, motif, win95, macos, 
whatever), and having Applications conform to that GUI, not make seperate 
sub-GUI's up for their own application.

== Chris Layne ==============================================================
== coredump@nervosa.com ================= http://www.nervosa.com/~coredump ==