Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:35:05 +0100 From: Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Funny battery values (nx6325) Message-ID: <20100317163505.GI52442@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308585A0FBD6D@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1268829363.6171.13.camel@RabbitsDen> <20100317224207.A85436@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20100317154327.04F841CC18@ptavv.es.net> <20100317161834.GH52442@uriah.heep.sax.de> <4911F71203A09E4D9981D27F9D8308585A0FBD6D@orsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Moore, Robert wrote: > There are two types of batteries, the "Smart Battery" and the > so-called "Control Method Battery". > AFAIK, by far, the control method battery is dominant. Smart > batteries are rare. Thanks, if all else (on the ACPI-level) fails, I'll remember this. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100317163505.GI52442>