Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:29:08 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bug in j0f() Message-ID: <20141203002908.GA98589@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20141203000941.GA98467@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20141202214325.GA94909@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20141203000941.GA98467@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:09:41PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:43:25PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Anyone object to the following patch? > > > > Index: e_j0f.c > > =================================================================== > > --- e_j0f.c (revision 275211) > > +++ e_j0f.c (working copy) > > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ > > * j0(x) = 1/sqrt(pi) * (P(0,x)*cc - Q(0,x)*ss) / sqrt(x) > > * y0(x) = 1/sqrt(pi) * (P(0,x)*ss + Q(0,x)*cc) / sqrt(x) > > */ > > - if(ix>0x80000000) z = (invsqrtpi*cc)/sqrtf(x); > > + if(ix>0x4b800000) z = (invsqrtpi*cc)/sqrtf(x); > > Exhaustive testing in the range 0x1p38 to 0x1p100 > indicated at the constant should be 0x54000000. > Note, a similar wrong condition exists within y0f(). I have not tested y0f(), but propose making a similar change in y0f() as well. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141203002908.GA98589>