From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 28 14:32:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F7E1065670 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:32:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82FF8FC08 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvtWz-0007F1-1U for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:01 +0200 Received: from pool-70-21-1-228.res.east.verizon.net ([70.21.1.228]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:01 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-70-21-1-228.res.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:32:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:31:42 -0400 Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7__23118.7355159365$1269784759$gmane$org@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-70-21-1-228.res.east.verizon.net Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:32:05 -0000 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Hi, > > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports > are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 > April. > > The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib > version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. > > Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and > http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built > to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed. > We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the problems. > > > Thank you, > > With hat: portmgr@ > Thank you very much for this notification. It surely is nice to know this. -Mike