From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 13 19:20:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D3416A419 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69CA813C481 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2007 19:20:14 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp045) with SMTP; 13 Oct 2007 21:20:14 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX186iZV2pZ86XUM3TZjRLrKj/8iF76uXM1uT0/Nk7O Jd+GY007e2k1Ox Message-ID: <47111A6C.8030500@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:20:12 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Josefsen , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <470F8026.5030109@cold.dk> <470FB231.2060701@gmx.de> <4710ED2B.5050301@cold.dk> In-Reply-To: <4710ED2B.5050301@cold.dk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: Missing libstdc++.so.6 for openoffice in stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:20:16 -0000 Brian Josefsen wrote: > [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Brian Josefsen wrote: >>> Hello all >>> >>> I installed the openoffice package >>> ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/2.3.0/i386/FreeBSD6/OOo_2.3.0_FreeBSD62Intel_install_da.tbz >>> >>> yesterday, now when i try to execute openoffice.org-2.3.0 it complaints >>> about libstdc++.so.6 is missing. As far as i remember libstdc++.so.6 is >>> part of GCC 4.2 and therefore first availible in -current. Now, am i a >>> moron and got everything wrong, or is this an error by whoever built >>> this package? >>> >>> I simply can't allow myself 2 days to build this one. >> >> You can install lang/gcc42 to get the file. > > Ok, never thought of that. Will that involve any problems for me if i > upgrade to -CURRENT or 7-release when it's ready ? This will not cause problems, however the package will still be linked against lang/gcc42, because that's what it was built with. You have to build it on 7 to have it linked against base libraries.