Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 16:16:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: darrylo@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com, questions@freefall.freebsd.org, me@freebsd.org Subject: Re: questions-digest V1 #1174 Message-ID: <199607312216.QAA04264@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199607312201.PAA21776@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> References: <199607311722.AA110103736@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com> <199607312201.PAA21776@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * If the Motif license allows it, could you just statically link the > * Motif library? > > It's possible, but do people really want this? Yes, we want it. I'd rather have XEmacs than not, and requiring a $100+ package to use it when it's not necessary seems a shame. > It's gonna be bloated, > and xemacs is already big enough at it is (the binary is almost 3MB > with shared everything!).... When you add in the lisp files, adding a couple hundred K more isn't going to make *THAT* big of a difference. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607312216.QAA04264>