Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Jan 1996 01:53:11 -0800
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@jhome.DIALix.COM>
Cc:        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts bin-install.sh 
Message-ID:  <22917.821094791@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jan 1996 16:44:47 %2B0800." <Pine.BSF.3.91.960108162944.496A-100000@jhome.DIALix.COM> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > 2.0 binaries "out of the box" in 2.0.5, please consider stepping
>                                    ^^^^^

Hmmm.  I could have sworn I also yelled about it in 2.1 - I just
blindly took the first one the search engine handed me without really
looking at it.  So much for supporting my case! :-)

> My research suggests that we need the following libs from 2.0-RELEASE in 
> a compat20.tgz dist:
> 
> libforms.so.2.0
> libncurses.so.2.0
> libdialog.so.2.0
> libg++.so.2.0
> libreadline.so.2.0
> 
> That's it!

OK, what do you think of the compat20.tgz sitting in my home directory
on freefall?

I supposed we could easily blap it on top of the old one in the
release tree as well and save a lot of future 2.1 installers a lot of
potential trouble, but we should consider the tech support impact of
having "old" and "new" compat20 files also.  Gah.

Thoughts?

					Jordan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22917.821094791>