From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jan 21 20:55:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA12581
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 20:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA12576
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 20:55:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA11024; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 20:49:17 -0800 (PST)
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: chuckr@glue.umd.edu (Chuck Robey), joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Commerical applications (was: Development and validation 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 Jan 1997 18:41:26 MST."
             <199701220141.SAA20620@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 20:49:17 -0800
Message-ID: <11021.853908557@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> The "perception of thought police" is what we have now.
> 
> What percentage "Linux vs. FreeBSD" usenet posts from the Linux side
> of the fence have claimed "FreeBSD has closed developement"?

Actually, these days almost gone and I haven't missed them a bit.

I think you're still operating from assumptions which are dated almost
a year now, it having been that long since I last saw the topic
seriously raised in USENET or the mailing lists, and it would appear
that we've brought enough people into the commit team just over the
last 6 months alone that few could claim we haven't been open to the
prospect of letting in new people or expanding the core team.

					Jordan