From owner-freebsd-www Thu Apr 24 06:15:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA05548 for www-outgoing; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 06:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schubert.promo.de (schubert.Promo.DE [194.45.188.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA05540 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 06:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [194.45.188.81] (stefan.Promo.DE [194.45.188.81]) by schubert.promo.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA18511; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 15:11:31 +0200 X-Sender: stefan@mail.promo.de Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199704241223.UAA24772@wisteria.singnet.com.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 15:14:03 +0200 To: Alpha Sarmian , www@freebsd.org From: Stefan Bethke Subject: Re: Which is stable and which is current? Sender: owner-freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 14:23 Uhr +0200 24.04.1997, Alpha Sarmian wrote: >Hi, I'm a little confused--is version 2.2 current and 2.17 stable? I cannot >seem to see it in the announcement letters which is which. You might want to direct such questions to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. Neither 2.2-RELEASE nor 2.1.7-RELEASE are "current" nor "stable"; both are releases (albeit both are more or less stable, and they are the latest releases). There are two "stable" branches, one for 2.2 (which contains fixes to the latest release of 2.2) and one for 2.1.7. "current" or, more exactly, "3.0-current" is the current development branch which is heavily being worked on, and will not be generally useful as a production environment. Hope this helps, Stefan -- Stefan Bethke Promo Datentechnik | Tel. +49-40-851744-0 + Systemberatung GmbH | Fax. +49-40-851744-44 Eduardstrasse 46-48 | e-mail: stefan@Promo.DE D-20257 Hamburg | http://www.Promo.DE/