From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 5 15:00:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD70A16A4C8 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F015543CB3 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 14:59:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 11177 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2006 15:00:17 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Dec 2006 15:00:16 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id DD0D528430; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 10:00:15 -0500 (EST) To: Laszlo Nagy References: <457092D0.8090401@designaproduct.biz> <45749A80.7000304@designaproduct.biz> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:00:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <45749A80.7000304@designaproduct.biz> (Laszlo Nagy's message of "Mon, 04 Dec 2006 23:00:32 +0100") Message-ID: <4464cq4ccg.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/eel linker error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:00:20 -0000 Laszlo Nagy writes: > The strange thing is that after running "portupgrade -rf > pkg-config\*", I tried to run it again and it started to upgrade > everything again. I think this is bad. No, that's exactly what "-f" means to portupgrade.