From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Feb 5 9: 1: 0 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF4637B401 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:00:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (corbulon.video-collage.com [64.35.99.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DF143FB1 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 09:00:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mi.us.murex.com (250-217.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.250.217]) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h15H0YM3072528 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:00:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Wilko Bulte , Miguel Mendez Subject: Re: dillon@'s commit bit: I object Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:01:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: eugen@grosbein.pp.ru, chat@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030205224625.A1356@grosbein.pp.ru> <20030205174738.467c0e9d.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> <20030205175427.A15708@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030205175427.A15708@freebie.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200302051201.02183.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.21 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [CC trimmed] On Wednesday 05 February 2003 11:54 am, Wilko Bulte wrote: = On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:47:38PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: = > Wilko Bulte wrote: = > > It is the fact that Matt has a history of repeated abusive = > > behavior to his fellow committers brought core to this decision. = > > It might be interesting to know that Matt has lost his commit bit = > > before, temporarily in that case. = > For certain values of abusive. This wouldn't be a problem for, e.g. = > the OpenBSD people. -core has set a threshold and that's what this = > is about, nothing more. If this was OpenBSD we'd be happily throwing = > stones at each other. = So? Do you prefer the stone throwing or not? Most FreeBSD people = appear adverse from stones being deployed this way :) There still is, and will be, stone/banana peel/egg/tomato throwing. Miguel's point, I think, was about our maximum tolerated size of the projectiles, and how OpenBSD's limit seems higher to him. -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message