Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:14:30 +0100 From: Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org> To: =?utf-8?Q?Ott_K=C3=B6stner?= <OttK@zzz.ee> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Unix program that sends email directly using MX record Message-ID: <BC09EB86-A648-4372-B14C-0DA8C46E0447@boosten.org> In-Reply-To: <49328C68.5000302@zzz.ee> References: <26face530811221316y5be5bf40ra5c38f389f554ca1@mail.gmail.com> <20081124173650.GA933@ourbrains.org> <20081124193819.GF55491@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20081129160329.GA27853@ourbrains.org> <47D7B64C-E783-48C8-A33B-A48AB66DA2E5@boosten.org> <20081129170434.GB27853@ourbrains.org> <493178CE.8070005@boosten.org> <49328C68.5000302@zzz.ee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30 nov 2008, at 13:51, Ott K=C3=B6stner <OttK@zzz.ee> wrote: > Peter Boosten wrote: > >> The most recent vulnerabilities of Postfix are from August and =20 >> September >> 2008, and I still use it. Also I use (with great happyness) =20 >> Sendmail on >> two machines, without any problems. The only problem ever caused =20 >> was by >> clamav. >> >> > Would be interesting to know, what kind of problems have been there =20= > with CLAMAV? > Just to be aware. I am currently using clamav </index.php/=20 > Clamav>-0.94.2 on some FreeBSD computers. > It has been some time ago, on openbsd, and the problem existed between =20= clamscan vs clamdscan. Never had any problems with clamav from the =20 ports in freebsd. Peter --=20 HTTP://www.boosten.org=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BC09EB86-A648-4372-B14C-0DA8C46E0447>