Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:14:30 +0100
From:      Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org>
To:        =?utf-8?Q?Ott_K=C3=B6stner?= <OttK@zzz.ee>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Unix program that sends email directly using MX record
Message-ID:  <BC09EB86-A648-4372-B14C-0DA8C46E0447@boosten.org>
In-Reply-To: <49328C68.5000302@zzz.ee>
References:  <26face530811221316y5be5bf40ra5c38f389f554ca1@mail.gmail.com>	<20081124173650.GA933@ourbrains.org>	<20081124193819.GF55491@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>	<20081129160329.GA27853@ourbrains.org>	<47D7B64C-E783-48C8-A33B-A48AB66DA2E5@boosten.org>	<20081129170434.GB27853@ourbrains.org> <493178CE.8070005@boosten.org> <49328C68.5000302@zzz.ee>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 30 nov 2008, at 13:51, Ott K=C3=B6stner <OttK@zzz.ee> wrote:

> Peter Boosten wrote:
>
>> The most recent vulnerabilities of Postfix are from August and =20
>> September
>> 2008, and I still use it. Also I use (with great happyness) =20
>> Sendmail on
>> two machines, without any problems. The only problem ever caused =20
>> was by
>> clamav.
>>
>>
> Would be interesting to know, what kind of problems have been there =20=

> with CLAMAV?
> Just to be aware. I am currently using clamav </index.php/=20
> Clamav>-0.94.2 on some FreeBSD computers.
>

It has been some time ago, on openbsd, and the problem existed between =20=

clamscan vs clamdscan. Never had any problems with clamav from the =20
ports in freebsd.

Peter
--=20
HTTP://www.boosten.org=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BC09EB86-A648-4372-B14C-0DA8C46E0447>