From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 13 13:33:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6575716A4CE for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:33:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE70443D1D for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:33:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ppp83-237-98-102.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([83.237.98.102] helo=[192.168.0.3]) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1DATD9-000BfT-9I; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:32:51 +0300 Message-ID: <4234410C.5080804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:33:00 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050111 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Edwards References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <41C26F23F7DF023CB3DF35C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr> <20050305151903.GC26240@hub.freebsd.org> <87mzth18e2.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <1DE178D508C1D70D1B5F9E87@cc-171.int.t-online.fr> <874qfpupk5.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <423027B1.8080503@FreeBSD.org> <34cb7c84050310091243cdc342@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <34cb7c84050310091243cdc342@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Denis Shaposhnikov cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:33:03 -0000 Peter Edwards wrote: > If someone experiencing these issues could try rebuilding after changing > > #define NNULLNODECACHE 16 > to > #define NNULLNODECACHE 1024 > > in null_subr.c (line 50 in my version, 1.45) > > And just see if it makes much of a difference. If so, it might be It does not help. The problem with nullfs only in jail environment. I've made a simple test: build devel/gettext port. Here is results: just ffs: 1:47 min nullfs: 1:43 min (oops!:) nullfs in jail: 12:12 min Almost ten times degradation. -- Sem.