From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 8 03:40:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0883E16A4CE for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 03:40:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B416D43D3F for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 03:40:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i783eROX053799; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:40:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i783eQeu053798; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:40:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:40:26 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dwayne MacKinnon Message-ID: <20040808034026.GB53594@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <4113A0AB.2030409@xwave.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4113A0AB.2030409@xwave.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problem with vim-6.3.15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 03:40:29 -0000 On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:15:55AM -0400, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote: > I did some web research on rcmdsh and vim (my first thought was that > someone had somehow inserted a trojan into vim :-) and found that this > sort of thing had happened before. The explanation, given by Kris > Kennaway, is that the binary had somehow been linked to both libc and > libc_r. I used ldd to check my vim binary, and sure enough, linked to both. ... > I'm on 4.10-RELEASE, btw. I wonder there may be a problem with ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk trying to support both 4.x and 5.x at the same time. I really don't have any 4.x development systems any more, so this isn't something I can look into. If you figure out what is going on and can send patches, that I something I can act on. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)