From owner-cvs-all Fri Oct 29 14: 3:31 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D804815107; Fri, 29 Oct 1999 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p01-dn02kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [210.163.200.98]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) with ESMTP id GAA19154; Sat, 30 Oct 1999 06:03:09 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <381A0A57.39AF4C7B@newsguy.com> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 05:57:59 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/gcore elfcore.c ... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Julian Elischer wrote: > > cvsweb cannot extract out a multifile patch. as the committer it is not up > to you decide "editorial change only" on a commit that hits 30 files. As > you yourself said to me a year or two ago, "Things have changed. We can > no-longer allow anyone (in that case you meant me) to run rampant over the > tree without review". (or words to that effect). 30 files is 30 files (or > however many it was). It should have been reviewed by *SOMEONE* and I hope > we won't be having this conversation again in 2 months time (again). I think Poul is correct here. Here merely shuffled some defines from one include file to another. And, for an include file change, 30 files is actually a sign of very little impact. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "People call him Neutron Star, 'cuz he's so dense lights bends around him." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message