From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 31 00:15:10 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832CA1065679
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:15:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E288FC0A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:15:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org>) id 1QyYSR-0003sz-PC
	for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:15:07 +0200
Received: from cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr ([188.129.116.21])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:15:07 +0200
Received: from ivoras by cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr with local (Gmexim
	0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:15:07 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:11:56 +0200
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <j3ju8s$kuo$2@dough.gmane.org>
References: <j38lj5$s9a$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<CAMBSHm_Sv_KZUs4h-tDGAZCq8s2qo_bMmfZxLbVkcH1=_Wu0OQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAF-QHFW=aU3=iKE9WMg6+D6eP9OXth=c0AidBc140ykmAPD2zg@mail.gmail.com>
	<201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-188-129-116-21.dynamic.amis.hr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
In-Reply-To: <201108291415.32605.jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:15:10 -0000

On 29.8.2011. 20:15, John Baldwin wrote:

> However, the SRAT code just ignores the table when it encounters an issue like
> this, it doesn't hang.  Something else later in the boot must have hung.

Anyway... that machine can in its maximal configuration be populated 
with eight 10-core CPUs, i.e. 80 physical / 160 logical, so here's a 
vote from me to bump the shiny new cpuset infrastructure maximum CPU 
count to 256 before 9.0.

http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/5U/5086/SYS-5086B-TRF.cfm