Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 01:35:24 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: howardjp@wam.umd.edu (James Howard) Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Response to ZDNet's anti-BSD Story Message-ID: <200006080135.SAA23389@usr09.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <200006070415.AAA05828@rac5.wam.umd.edu> from "James Howard" at Jun 07, 2000 12:15:10 AM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> it to OSOpinion sometime tomorrow. I decided to send it to the mailing > list first to solicit suggestions and recomendations on it. So, without > further ado, here it is, enjoy. [ ... ] > Microsoft had > taken the open source MIT software, made changes affecting compatibility, > and released the new version without the source code. Except they didn't take the MIT code, they rolled their own from the specifications, and then misused a field against the stated intent of the uses for that field by the protocol author. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006080135.SAA23389>