Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:52:43 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1 killall.c src/usr.sbin Makefile src/usr.sbin/jail jail.8 jail.c src/usr.sbin/jexec Makefile jexec.8 jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c Message-ID: <20030409235243.GI30960@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030409194655.31027C-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304091639540.30429-100000@root.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030409194655.31027C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> [030409 16:48] wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > > And what kind of path seperator is '.'? > > > > Exactly. What you're describing would be better implemented as a > > pseudo-fs layer. In fact, that would remove the need for separate j* > > utilities. > > I thought we were trying to get away from synthetic file systems with > terrible security properties. In fact, we specifically toasted procfs > because it behaved so badly; kernfs went down the tubes because the > semantic match was very poor, and sysctl is in. Whatever, path components should be path components.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030409235243.GI30960>