From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 29 16:39:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA23168 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:39:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zone.syracuse.net (zone.syracuse.net [205.232.47.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA23151 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:39:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from green@zone.syracuse.net) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by zone.syracuse.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA00253; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 19:38:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 19:38:40 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Feldman To: Mike Smith cc: John Hay , Garrett Wollman , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 in -current In-Reply-To: <199810300030.QAA01188@dingo.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, I can understand this. I mean, when things get rushed, noone is happy (I won't open the 3.0 can of worms, but I'm glad Jordan (or whoever else did them?) had the guts to say it is a _developer_release_! Damn nestea bug...)) I am expressing my sentiments that this would be a GREAT selling point for a later FreeBSD release, just like CAM, SoftUpdates, new VM system, SMP,the new boot-loader, ELF, all sorts of code rewirtes, etc. are great selling points for 3.x. Whenever a regional ISP does IPv6, I wouldn't mind at all in testing/implementing IPv6 in various parts of the system (and yes, I mean modem ISP *sigh*). Let's not rush it, but we should get KAME or another IPv6 stack in a vendor branch as soon as feasible/comfortable. Cheers, Brian Feldman On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > > It would look Really Good on, say, 3.1-RELEASE release notes to say: > > * Full IPv6 implementation in-kernel and libc! > > Just a thought :) > > It would suck, however, if the consensus was that we rushed the > integration just to get the check-mark item. The people in the driving > seat are acutely aware of the pros and cons, and I'm inclined to accept > their judgement (while also accepting that supportive noise from the > userbase such as yours is also *extremely* valuable). > > -- > \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith > \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au > \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org > \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message