Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 11:42:55 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: chuckr@glue.umd.edu, terry@lambert.org, j@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Demand loading (Re: FreeBSD, Zappa & PCI) Message-ID: <199601041842.LAA18197@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <26430.820729434@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 3, 96 08:23:54 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Jordan, I can understand your first argument, but since SVR4 has been > > running ELF for quite some time now, well, the second argument is a > > little harder to see, for me. Does ELF really still qualify as new > > technology? > > Chuck, think a moment here. What *technology* to implement ELF > executables was used by SVR4? Is it the same technology we have > available to us? No. Then what? The GNU stuff. Has the GNU > stuff been speaking ELF for long? No. I rest my case. So when are we going to COFF to get multiple segments in a binary? 8-) 8-) 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601041842.LAA18197>