Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Jan 1996 11:42:55 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Cc:        chuckr@glue.umd.edu, terry@lambert.org, j@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Demand loading (Re: FreeBSD, Zappa & PCI)
Message-ID:  <199601041842.LAA18197@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <26430.820729434@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 3, 96 08:23:54 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Jordan, I can understand your first argument, but since SVR4 has been 
> > running ELF for quite some time now, well, the second argument is a 
> > little harder to see, for me.  Does ELF really still qualify as new 
> > technology?
> 
> Chuck, think a moment here.  What *technology* to implement ELF
> executables was used by SVR4?  Is it the same technology we have
> available to us?  No.  Then what?  The GNU stuff.  Has the GNU
> stuff been speaking ELF for long?  No.  I rest my case.

So when are we going to COFF to get multiple segments in a binary?

8-) 8-) 8-).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601041842.LAA18197>