From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 23 12:59:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BDE16A415 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from soralx@cydem.org) Received: from pd4mo1so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DB043D45 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:59:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soralx@cydem.org) Received: from pd2mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.108]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J7L00J25AQS6W70@l-daemon> for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 06:59:16 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml5so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.149]) by pd2mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J7L0085JAQSNNE1@pd2mr3so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 06:59:16 -0600 (MDT) Received: from soralx.cydem.org ([24.87.27.3]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J7L00FI3AQSFW00@l-daemon> for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 06:59:16 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 05:58:35 -0700 From: soralx@cydem.org In-reply-to: To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Message-id: <200610230558.35558.soralx@cydem.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <20061021190315.7aa63143.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> <200610231140.k9NBeBK9049488@lurza.secnetix.de> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Subject: Re: FreeBSD branches stats X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:59:21 -0000 > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > > > However, the number for 2.x systems seems a bit high indeed. > > I think the users who still run 2.x systems tend to tune > > them manually and watch the lists closely for things that > > need to be patched. > > Or the script is picking maybe NetBSD or OpenBSD, both of which had 2.x > versions comparatively recently? precisely freebsd 2.2.7 an newer were far more popular than 2.1 (which is in the stats) [SorAlx] ridin' VN1500-B2