From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan  8 11:36:23 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA19384
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 11:36:23 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from db2server.voga.com.br (db2server.voga.com.br [200.239.39.7])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA19275
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 11:35:54 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from daniel_sobral@voga.com.br)
From: daniel_sobral@voga.com.br
Received: from papagaio.voga.com.br (papagaio.voga.com.br [200.239.39.2])
	by db2server.voga.com.br (8.8.3+2.6Wbeta9/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA12368
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:18:52 -0200
Received: by papagaio.voga.com.br(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.06 (346.7 3-18-1997))  id 03256586.006F9618 ; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:18:49 -0300
X-Lotus-FromDomain: VOGA
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-ID: <83256586.006F7192.00@papagaio.voga.com.br>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 17:18:41 -0300
Subject: Re: make_device_driver.sh
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


> Is there any chance I can convince you to do seperate
> open/close calls for each instance of an open or a close?

That would be the "reflexive" interface? :-)

Now that I have _seen_ how screwed up the thing is, I whole heartedly
behind the proposal.

--
Daniel C. Sobral                      (8-DCS)
Daniel_Sobral@voga.com.br