From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 28 23:41:39 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA06613 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:41:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from itp.ac.ru (itp.ac.ru [193.233.32.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA06604 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:41:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ks@itp.ac.ru) Received: from speecart.chg.ru (speecart.chg.ru [193.233.46.2]) by itp.ac.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA06841 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:45:19 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:42:18 +0300 (MSK) Organization: Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics From: "Sergey S. Kosyakov" To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: select and threads again Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I did not receive answer on previous mail, so again: is select(2) really thread-safe in 3.0R? In detail: can I call select in a number of concurrent threads, e.g., for connection or data waiting? This is essential of Xerox ILU operations in multy-thread mode. Thanks, Sergey --- ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message