From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 24 22:08:46 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A788D321 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63243162E for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::f51f:bdb:ce1c:7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:f51f:bdb:ce1c:7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDFB65C44; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:08:43 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EA727316-D348-44A6-91DB-E734BEEC9360"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL (OpenBSD) From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: <20140424223540.627bf130.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:08:42 +0200 Message-Id: <23CF0EE3-3387-47C7-9DCE-61F20D87E8D9@FreeBSD.org> References: <20140424223540.627bf130.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: "O. Hartmann" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:08:46 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_EA727316-D348-44A6-91DB-E734BEEC9360 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 24 Apr 2014, at 22:35, O. Hartmann = wrote: > It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation, = called LibreSSL. As > OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the = code of OpenSSL, I'd > like to hear what the plans are in FreeBSD for this critical portion = of software. >=20 > Is FreeBSD going to support the effords taken by OpenBSD and = participating in the > LibreSSL development (http://www.libressl.org/)? Wouldn't it be wiser to wait and see what comes out of this project? :) Besides, they're first making it for OpenBSD only (which is completely reasonable), porting it will come even later. If you want to contribute to LibreSSL now, I think the best you can do is to donate money. They don't seem to need more programmers... :) -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_EA727316-D348-44A6-91DB-E734BEEC9360 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlNZi2oACgkQsF6jCi4glqP11gCfflBwytfVOKKcdXKTquTXwke9 yFAAn2Y8NwMGFEb+zLh5fkfuwXvr3xrv =m1o6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_EA727316-D348-44A6-91DB-E734BEEC9360--