From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mon Apr 11 10:27:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77DA5B0B800 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5134C12F5 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: by mail-ig0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id ui10so68697997igc.1 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:27:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mDPB7Q6vuWMJAOdzLyAplsEVyYvqZ/SeEUDKN2N4yGc=; b=EtfF0EDXvInipZDIlh9oKHnLjs8rKHXoLXSNi3WrhsJnlx6q+A3/SY8G6FM2D9dJYK 0bnpNcOhcqMJ3JalJ8vaaa2NW2810Obkk/lK3lNYOrkd6VlIGcoDIr+02vulqq2JizAo XCpEf2Slr25So6pCkHCWNb752l/UKEPfXhieg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=mDPB7Q6vuWMJAOdzLyAplsEVyYvqZ/SeEUDKN2N4yGc=; b=TKOAqie7iARBem3W4J7UuFuyqo9sKID82F5Qg9/XiBFggkto40QUkG66CIS5wCEpPc kOgXk2AFJ1EnS5FHyz3gn5BgiTVCTpwU9Ho1+gdD8ioDYMLHPo/FkpIwOWtGPYdEMJga 9SdlT/Xb5Edhe5dVANZKiWwCoJGl+ZLS9rbH6vc3HiqBHIO3abwYuKeaVVHULFkrqwaP TQ+r6KRYib7I9LBLS0FK+M9B5spzFPOPRT1EsjZQel4wR7TbNvsCPJ5Yn+Ylh8ZMbETB wQ8ky7dnlW2547Au8BWFFBfbrBIHTtO9KvPxw2BcA+ilac2WVqJT8jIPCGP8yHbczrmV givQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKS68081svQJ4C2j5CaX7HyLi6XbD2JMPZVrWFgmYOcayWt+sol1jAyMoQzocnH4DyQIvMPynYJf671Qg== X-Received: by 10.50.147.67 with SMTP id ti3mr16609975igb.48.1460370445585; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 03:27:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201604110905.u3B95E7E026844@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Otac=C3=ADlio_de_Ara=C3=BAjo_Ramos_Neto?= Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:27:16 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: WIFI urtwn possibly broken on 297561 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:27:26 -0000 Em seg, 11 de abr de 2016 06:05, Anton Shterenlikht escreveu: > > > >Hi! > > > >this is because we don't have A-MPDU RX aging on by default. So, if > >there are holes in the sequence number space, FreeBSD's reordering > >logic doesn't flush frames up until it's received /all/ the traffic. > > > >I've just enabled it by default in -HEAD now. That should fix it. > >Otacilio, you should be able to fix it locally by adding options > >IEEE80211_AMPDU_AGE to your kernel config file and recompiling. > > > >Sorry! > > Is this urtwn PR related to this: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205477 > > Thanks > > Anton > I can't say that yes or no because I have testes only on CURRENT and the bug report is related to 10. But, the issue don't look related. In my case a previous version of CURRENT works fine and after a update to a new revision it stop works, but only under load. It is not related to initialization problem (I think). []'S -Otacilio >