From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 05:15:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B428637B401 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 05:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.covadmail.net (mx01.covadmail.net [63.65.120.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86B1D43F3F for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 05:15:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scott@hiemstra.us) Received: (covad.net 24409 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2003 12:15:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO playland) (68.165.225.111) by sun-qmail16 with SMTP; 3 Jun 2003 12:15:17 -0000 From: "Scott Hiemstra" To: "FreeBSD" Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 08:15:19 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <001301c329c7$f9c23170$7419cdcd@mykroft.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: PPPoE load balancing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 12:15:21 -0000 Valid point, I must have been dreaming when I originally read his post... Scott -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Adam Maas Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:02 AM To: Scott Hiemstra; FreeBSD Subject: Re: PPPoE load balancing ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Hiemstra" To: "FreeBSD" Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:37 PM Subject: RE: PPPoE load balancing > Maybe another option: > Purchasing a hardware solution; I've never used one personally but I have > heard good things about the Fatpipe Superstream from friends ($3,000 or so). > Several other companies make the exact same thing just in different forms. > It will allow you to bond multiple dsl/cable whatever and you don't need > BGP. To implement BGP normally you need a pretty beefy router (My feelings > are a cisco 3600 and up). > > Scott > > For what he's doing, I'd just run a routing daemon on a BSD box, or a Cisco 2600. No need for a full table. Adam _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"