Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:56:57 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: HU Dong <itechbear@gmail.com>, thomas.sander@gmx.de Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why kdbg hasn't been upgraded? Message-ID: <CADLo83_Wh54BgbZQc46BF5qv=Y06CrWWjj_FbKLF7npLNZ1nOA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAA96eVtLSLipErNOCotjg1Z65rLNv97hQsYrpRy3GH0SaUCS=w@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAA96eVtLSLipErNOCotjg1Z65rLNv97hQsYrpRy3GH0SaUCS=w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Copying in maintainer. On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" <itechbear@gmail.com> wrote: > kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port > devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a > little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it > should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR. > > B.R. > HU Dong > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83_Wh54BgbZQc46BF5qv=Y06CrWWjj_FbKLF7npLNZ1nOA>