From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 10 08:56:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394AE1065673 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:56:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2248FC15 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so920250lbb.13 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:56:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Rgpz407DpTPjAiQG+rkMxfFNOmiBbvmvM96FMONH/Ok=; b=E2xwkc9wBYPUw2b0eX7dVXCQG9dH+y/2bkhyYbgVawcQ83W3N2GAZw8RZP+GgxtOw1 3RNTHwdQkBCiG8LvKqmHPBYM4tkUasKijIJn636KqvVKU5DfVgTJ4TIifFNWz4747Lz9 r13yDvl7Sfbgo14WffTR+q/jeI4yR2Zvt3SA4ND1nyfSkl3yhDGO3XiPp3ByNViCiTKq nMLHcfefY0CzPzcgjTFitqnFUzDg/6Rea3NIR5fD2CrHYKkqoybfk2hoPfIg0xqmBz08 HZyDGhBXvbaoIkuslUR7KVhcSPn7Apdr4AvWX7U7Z3AhvFd0FASma81A7jduKH5qqRGb isxA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.77 with SMTP id gc13mr2254401lab.31.1344589017322; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.36.227 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.36.227 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:56:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:56:57 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: HU Dong , thomas.sander@gmx.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why kdbg hasn't been upgraded? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:56:59 -0000 Copying in maintainer. On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" wrote: > kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port > devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a > little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it > should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR. > > B.R. > HU Dong > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >