From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 1 15:16:11 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA05417 for current-outgoing; Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:16:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from desiree.teleport.com (desiree.teleport.com [192.108.254.21]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA05411 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:16:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from linda.teleport.com (linda.teleport.com [192.108.254.12]) by desiree.teleport.com (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA20100; Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:16:08 -0800 (PST) From: Mostyn/Annabella Received: (from mrl@localhost) by linda.teleport.com (8.8.3/8.7.3) id PAA08974; Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:14:58 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612012314.PAA08974@linda.teleport.com> Subject: Kernels - cache - fast,slow,fast,slow To: current@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:14:58 -0800 (PST) Cc: mrl@teleport.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've been seeing a frustrating speed difference between different current kernels. We have a server - 133Mhz Pentium - running an old 2.2 current from abount May which usually seemed a lot faster than succeeding ones. So I did some investigation. Using the kernel routine, nfs_serv.c as a benchmark and 4 kernels on a 133Mhz Pentium we got Kernel from May - ~19 secs compile Kernel from Oct 1 - ~31 secs 2.2-961014-SNAP kernel - ~19 secs Yesterday's kernel (3.0) - ~31 secs After much ***ting around I found that switching off the 512Kb Pipeline cache left all of them at ~31 seconds! So it seems that we are missing the hardware cache on some systems and not on others. This shows as a significant difference. Can anybody nail this one down? Mostyn