From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Mar 25 5:47: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6016714EF5 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 05:46:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (haldjas.folklore.ee [172.17.2.1] (may be forged)) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.8/8.8.4) with SMTP id PAA23119; Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:45:25 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:45:25 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi To: The Hermit Hacker Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Oops...(www.userfriendly.org) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > And it started soooooo well :) > > http://www.userfriendly.org/cartoons/archives/99mar/19990325.html > Ouch!!! In the case of Linux it's the users who can't agree what is the best but in the case of *BSD it's the daemons? Hey wait - there is just one BSD daemon so the daemon is arguing with itself which is better? Or does (Free/Open)BSD have a separate one? The daemon should be able to decide that arguing with itself is silly and leave it to the user 8-) > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy > Systems Administrator @ hub.org > primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org > Sander There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future - all these are just illusions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message