From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 08:26:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F6E8DCE for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nibbler.fubar.geek.nz (nibbler.fubar.geek.nz [199.48.134.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AF12770 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bender.lan (97e07ba1.skybroadband.com [151.224.123.161]) by nibbler.fubar.geek.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BAF15DEBC; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 09:20:41 +0100 From: Andrew Turner To: mexas@bris.ac.uk Subject: Re: svnlite segfaults a lot Message-ID: <20140702092041.716a7413@bender.lan> In-Reply-To: <201407010930.s619Uk9X006689@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201407010930.s619Uk9X006689@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 08:26:33 -0000 On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:30:46 +0100 (BST) Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > # uname -a > FreeBSD raspberry-pi 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r267801: > Tue Jun 24 11:03:28 UTC 2014 > root@grind.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI-B arm > > I'm trying to pull the ports tree to rasp. pi model B. > svnlite up (or co) segfaults after pulling 1-5 MB. > Is this expected? > > I'm powering via a bench power supply, so I can > monitor the current. It is only about 400mA, > occasionally raising to maybe 450mA. > So my earlier suspicion, that an inadequate > power was to blame, was wrong. > > Anybody else seeing svnlite segfaults? Yes, however I never tracked it down. I found svn from ports to work as expected. Andrew