From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 10 21:04:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFEB16A41C; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (darkness.comp.waw.pl [195.117.238.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280DF43D48; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009) id 5D3C1ACC26; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:04:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:04:28 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Maxim.Sobolev@portaone.com Message-ID: <20050710210428.GF46538@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <200507082128.j68LSQlp096358@repoman.freebsd.org> <42D16238.7010206@portaone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zll6mx50Q8J7qlLQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42D16238.7010206@portaone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386 Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ggate/ggatec Makefile ggatec.c src/sbin/ggate/ggated Makefile ggated.c src/sbin/ggate/shared ggate.c ggate.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:04:30 -0000 --Zll6mx50Q8J7qlLQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:00:24PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: +> Great work, Pawel! +>=20 +> Unrelated question, but I wonder if it would be a good idea to base=20 +> ggate on some industry-standart remote-storage protocol instead (iSCSI= =20 +> being an obvious choice) or at least add a support for it. In ggate you simply forward I/O requests (reads and writes) to userland and back. iSCSI is much more complex and it's below GEOM layer. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --Zll6mx50Q8J7qlLQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC0Y1cForvXbEpPzQRAq3aAJ96sRJ/5uM+K7FB+WqHxBLJvKDzygCff+yh 8bNvnvDM0v0VGKfd4yZ0gI0= =5aYb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zll6mx50Q8J7qlLQ--