From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Oct 10 8:57: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A82337B401 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 08:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f9AFuvU63583; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:56:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 11:56:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200110101556.f9AFuvU63583@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_proc.c kern_prot.c uipc_socket.c uipc_usrreq.c src/sys/netinet raw_ip.c tcp_subr.c udp_usrreq.c In-Reply-To: References: <200110092140.f99LeVA74145@freefall.freebsd.org> <200110101522.f9AFM0S63283@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > Unless you can provide an argument showing that this is necessary to > the correct operation of a FreeBSD system, I'll simply ignore your > contribution to this discussion. And I'll simply ignore your ``contribution'' as well, if that's how you feel about it. You asked ``would people mind a lot''. I answered the question: yes, people would mind a great deal. The process table is *public information*, and has always been so in the entire history of UNIX. You are proposing a totally unacceptable POLA violation. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message