From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 08:43:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7002C16A4CF; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:43:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.willystudios.com (mail2.willystudios.com [65.39.221.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92E843D5E; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:43:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from max@willystudios.com) Received: from mail.willystudios.com (unknown [81.208.36.81]) by mail2.willystudios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85197D9DC; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:42:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from vekkio.willystudios.com (host44-22.pool80182.interbusiness.it [80.182.22.44]) by mail.willystudios.com (Postfix) with SMTP id ED08E3E; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:43:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:42:50 +0100 From: Massimiliano Stucchi To: David McNett Message-Id: <20040205174250.78afa62e@vekkio.willystudios.com> In-Reply-To: <20040205162617.GA4275@slacker.com> References: <20040205162617.GA4275@slacker.com> Organization: WillyStudios.com, LTD X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__5_Feb_2004_17_42_50_+0100_Z8aviJR07rxZyIuk" cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Promise SX6000 controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:43:10 -0000 --Signature=_Thu__5_Feb_2004_17_42_50_+0100_Z8aviJR07rxZyIuk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 10:26:17 -0600 David McNett wrote: > I haven't worked with the SX6000 specifically, but in my testing I > found the Promise and the Highpoint cards to be erratic during drive > failures. The data was safe but it was not difficult to induce a > system lockup by disabling one of the drives in a raid1 configuration. What about using the superswap 1000 bays that come with with the Fasttrack 2000TX pro ? I think that being hot-swap bays they should handle the situation in a slightly different way. Is there anybody with some feedback on this ? Greetings -- Stucchi Massimiliano | Gruppo Utenti FreeBSD Italia WillyStudios.com | http://www.gufi.org stucchi@willystudios.com | max@gufi.org "People who make no mistakes do not usually make anything" -- Stucchi Massimiliano | Gruppo Utenti FreeBSD Italia WillyStudios.com | http://www.gufi.org stucchi@willystudios.com | max@gufi.org "People who make no mistakes do not usually make anything" --Signature=_Thu__5_Feb_2004_17_42_50_+0100_Z8aviJR07rxZyIuk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAInKKFwcpJfdZDoERAt6JAJ97kqVTJeILqzYGfwWHP4/1AjDTEACdEVwX uMIeSR5t2L4QZ2zzV2uBZTY= =3TLU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__5_Feb_2004_17_42_50_+0100_Z8aviJR07rxZyIuk--