From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 21:09:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F8F106566B; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163B48FC0A; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from delta.delphij.net (drawbridge.ixsystems.com [206.40.55.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9128763C4; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:09:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1321650597; bh=q5KCwkk8FASNyXT9/+Bgn2Fth4B11C2yuRxPzCkj6v0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DcaSAz/MQ8bXuhzIXNGpi8trTt9q9Ao9zlSnZp/OiR5OUZBffdGKIvRVBWp3aR5tR wwA4ospiZSSbOJr8QbApyM1SMECnwjYvlvjrW/EFSw7Z2dLL2EBZLUZZRSUP8TOiXF ZNFsWU3iCJFofNExdPCvlad6y5m7nxMWXm59hbLI= Message-ID: <4EC6C9A4.3000006@delphij.net> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:09:56 -0800 From: Xin LI Organization: The FreeBSD Project MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eygene Ryabinkin References: <4EB6693F.2020102@delphij.net> <4EB71580.20507@FreeBSD.org> <4EB72290.8030104@delphij.net> <4EC6C247.6040807@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=3FCA37C1; url=http://www.delphij.net/delphij.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG, Doug Barton , d@delphij.net Subject: Re: Annoying ERROR: 'wlan0' is not a DHCP-enabled interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d@delphij.net List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:09:58 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/18/11 12:45, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Xin, good day. > > Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:38:31PM -0800, Xin LI wrote: >> Is there any counter reasoning about "having an interface marked >> as non-DHCP is not an error"? I'm still not convinced with the >> benefit of having it show an error message. > > Well, when I invoke 'service dhclient start em0' and em0 isn't > DHCP-enabled, I want to see some diagnostics on why I was not able > to get DHCP on that interface. Return code isn't that visible (I > can, of course, always run it as 'service dhclient start em0 || > echo failed'), but I am not up to typing more than needed and I > should see the real reason for absence of DHCP-assigned address in > that case, be it the non-DHCP-enabled interface or some other > problem. Thinking again I believe that your approach is more sensible. Thanks! Cheers, - -- Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOxsmkAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBRIYH/3dvKGznpmDbwPlNO0b4qs4w +Nd4eCKXY0SzHIvZqxm0c9HHE8wvMaZnQFqYb7rOYdlIYHosJfvhiTbIV1kr9YAJ FWmx93bCmzxf1HD3mVuOOCRzOoFEVcJPCstigh9Bp8Jj0EFPu6krbagrVCkY80Jo ZvRJoSEDmqKB8fve23RSpKVDrA5LlQ0Y98AC91yPKpVt/FdHsdWD7/+kKCF2G+uP OBPi8iCdHm4OALdX2YcHGQJFNZIixftEj74FHTHKDrlnBsiLb633U09kzprKMrqf 0iovaPf5OfX/smk8rLx0MrsFBDwSUwIhsaBsJJZr4vCtVDn4j0h0MZjtESZxO74= =BENK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----