From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 13:13:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE954106564A for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@oddbit.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA2D8FC16 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so5378769iwr.13 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.130.201 with SMTP id w9mr7522848ics.136.1308661994986; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hw7sm6779857icc.3.2011.06.21.06.13.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iwr19 with SMTP id 19so5378733iwr.13 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:13:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.111.228 with SMTP id t36mr6278984ibp.59.1308661993007; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.39.137 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:13:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E00981B.3070102@radel.com> References: <201106211128.p5LBSvCe095130@x.it.okstate.edu> <4E00981B.3070102@radel.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:13:12 -0400 Message-ID: From: Lars Kellogg-Stedman To: Jon Radel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two Networks on one System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:13:15 -0000 > This, in of itself, doesn't follow. =C2=A0In the absence of stateful fire= walls > and anti-spoofing filtering (blocking packets that don't have a source IP > address on the "expected" list), While I can't comment on anyone else's environment, it is in my experience very common in most corporate and educational settings for routers to have anti-spoofing rules that will drop anything with an ip address that does not originate on the local subnet. -- Lars