From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 18:17:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3512AC72; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fire.magemana.nl (magemana.nl [77.72.149.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97CB1BA2; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:17:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fire.magemana.nl (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 185454ADC69; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:17:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.magemana.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B694ADC68; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:17:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 20:17:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Melvyn Sopacua To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Repair pkgng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <534527D6.5000802@marino.st> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Jakob Breivik Grimstveit , marino@freebsd.org, Melvyn Sopacua , FreeBSD Ports mailing list X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 18:17:25 -0000 Hi, So, after the detour... >> On 4/9/2014 12:38, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: >>> Though it makes no sense in my mind. Distfiles belong to ports not >>> packages. What problem was solved by moving this? This still doesn't make sense. Distfiles are of no concern to binary packages, so why would I continue to clutter /var/db/pkg with a large tree of directories that is then duplicated to /var/db/ports? What problem in portmaster or the options framework was solved by moving this?