Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 00:28:00 -0600 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> To: stephen@freebsd.org Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r485844 - head/math/octave Message-ID: <CACNAnaEOSoPp2znvxix_q6UUVAgc_twbCju8BWoBGUabuaKbgQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201811250555.wAP5t5OC014092@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201811250555.wAP5t5OC014092@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 11:55 PM Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Author: stephen > Date: Sun Nov 25 05:55:05 2018 > New Revision: 485844 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/485844 > > Log: > - Make changes to plist that should have been included with r485798. > - Bump portrevision. > > Reported by: pkg-fallout@ > Hmm... my poudriere run did not catch this. =/ Does poudriere not sanity check the plist in bulk runs? If not, is there a way to enable it to, somehow, in a way that isn't going to jam me up on all of the dependencies I don't care about? My general workflow for this kind of stuff is patch 4-8 ports -> bulk build those 4-8 ports -> submit because i was for some reason under the impression that poudriere was more pedantic about plist changes. Thanks, Kyle Evans
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaEOSoPp2znvxix_q6UUVAgc_twbCju8BWoBGUabuaKbgQ>