From owner-freebsd-arch Tue May 22 18:54: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from newsguy.com (smtp.newsguy.com [209.155.56.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845B437B422 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 18:53:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (ppp185-bsace7001.telebrasilia.net.br [200.181.80.185]) by newsguy.com (8.11.0/8.9.1) with ESMTP id f4N1qiF11150; Tue, 22 May 2001 18:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B0B1816.729E3928@newsguy.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 22:53:26 -0300 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,pt,en-GB,en-US,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Somers Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , Garrett Wollman , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: unit_list routines References: <200105230038.f4N0cAb12470@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brian Somers wrote: > > I can't see any way of deriving the two from any common set of > routines either - the resource_list stuff needs a hierarchy by it's > nature, and I guess the ``count'' bits are intended (eventually) for > handling limited resources such as power - not really applicable to > unit allocation. > > Maybe I'm missing something though ? Isn't what you want precisely what md does (at least on current)? -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.secret.bsdconspiracy.net wow regex humor... I'm a geek To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message