From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Wed Oct 25 16:29:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9760E4EA96; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A40587440C; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 017B41DFFF; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:29:21 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: rgrimes@freebsd.org Cc: Michael Tuexen , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r324971 - head/sys/netinet Message-ID: <20171025162921.GA84006@FreeBSD.org> References: <201710250912.v9P9CMar060973@repo.freebsd.org> <201710251457.v9PEvEZU052398@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201710251457.v9PEvEZU052398@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:29:22 -0000 On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 07:57:14AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > New Revision: 324971 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/324971 > > > > Log: > > Fix a bug reported by Felix Weinrank using the libfuzzer on the > > userland stack. > > Please try to say what the bug was, why it was a bug, and > how it was fixed in any bug commit message. > > External vague references are of little value when reading > through a files svn history. Honestly, I don't understand at all why this topic comes up again and again. It's beaten to death, aren't people supposed to read svn-* mail? :-( ./danfe