From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Oct 27 13:56:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD1437B427 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:56:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id f9RKuiZ64324; Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:56:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 13:56:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200110272056.f9RKuiZ64324@apollo.backplane.com> To: Garrett Wollman Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: time_t not to change size on x86 References: <20011027070109.D02E9380A@overcee.netplex.com.au> <200110272007.f9RK7NG88372@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <200110272029.f9RKTIi56468@apollo.backplane.com> <200110272049.f9RKn9K88676@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :< said: : :> If time_t can be a double, it damn :> well can be an int64_t. : :No, it can't. RTFS. : :-GAWollman We are still waiting to see what both C90 and C99 say. As DES would say, quote the standard. So far nothing I've heard prevents us from being able to make time_t a 64 bit int on IA32. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message